Vulnerability review
Regulated software teams need a vulnerability review workflow that records more than a scanner result. Severity, ownership, SLA pressure, remediation state, and reviewer decisions need to stay traceable.
Findings become operational evidence when teams record who reviewed them, what was decided, and how the decision changed over time.
Review CVEs with severity and product-version context.
Record ownership, notes, and review state.
Keep decisions tied to the underlying SBOM and product record.
Teams need to see what is overdue, blocked, assigned, or ready for closure before release decisions are made.
Track SLA pressure and unresolved findings.
Show ownership and blocked work.
Retain remediation state changes as part of the evidence trail.
New vulnerabilities can appear after a product ships. A retained review history helps explain what was known, reviewed, and updated.
Preserve review activity across re-analysis cycles.
Keep remediation decisions timestamped.
Support audit trail and customer evidence review.
Related workflows
These pages explain how SBOM intake, vulnerability review, remediation tracking, and evidence history fit together.
Next step
Review intake, vulnerability decisions, remediation pressure, and retained evidence for one product line.